{"id":64,"date":"2008-08-22T13:12:45","date_gmt":"2008-08-22T12:12:45","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/f5len.org\/index.php?entry=entry080822-141245"},"modified":"2008-08-22T13:12:45","modified_gmt":"2008-08-22T12:12:45","slug":"dxcc-point-de-reglement-retire","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/f5len.org\/blog\/dxcc-point-de-reglement-retire\/","title":{"rendered":"DXCC point de r\u00e9glement r\u00e9tir\u00e9"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Dans la m\u00eame veine que mon <a href=\"http:\/\/www.f5len.org\/index.php?entry=entry080820-141310\" target=\"_blank\" >billet d&#039;hier<\/a> concernant les modifications apport\u00e9es au r\u00e8glement du CQ WW DX, le 18 aout est paru sur <a href=\"http:\/\/www.arrl.org\/blog\/DXCC%20Dialog\" target=\"_blank\" >le site de l&#039;ARRL<\/a> un billet, indiquant la supression de la r\u00e8gle 5 de la section III du DXCC.<br \/>Ca fait vachement s\u00e9rieux hein?<br \/>Voyons de quoi il en retourne.<\/p>\n<p>Que disait cette r\u00e9gle:<\/p>\n<p><i>5. The presentation in any public forum of logs or other representations of station operation showing details of station activity or other information from which all essential QSO elements (time, date, band, mode and callsign) for individual contacts can be derived creates a question as to the integrity of the claimed QSOs with that station during the period encompassed by the log. Presentation of such information in any public forum by the station operator, operators or associated parties is not allowed and may be considered sufficient reason to deny ARRL award credit for contacts with any station for which such presentations have been made. Persistent violation of this provision may result in disqualification from the DXCC program.<\/i><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"javascript:openpopup('http:\/\/www.arrl.org\/awards\/dxcc\/dxcccert.jpg',800,600,false);\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/www.arrl.org\/awards\/dxcc\/dxcccert.jpg\" border=\"0\" alt=\"\" \/><\/a><br \/>Traduction (approximative) et r\u00e9sum\u00e9 par mes soins:<\/p>\n<p>La divulgation des d\u00e9tails de l&#039;activit\u00e9 d&#039;une station permettant d&#039;en d\u00e9duire des \u00e9l\u00e9ments essentiels d&#039;un QSO tels que date, heure, indicatif, mode etc avec cette station, fait que l&#039;on peut se poser la question de la r\u00e9alit\u00e9 de ce qso avec cette station. La consultation de ces \u00e9l\u00e9ments n&#039;est donc pas permise, sous peine de voir l&#039;\u00e9ligibilit\u00e9 au DXCC des qso r\u00e9alis\u00e9s avec cette station supprim\u00e9.<\/p>\n<p>En effet, \u00e0 partir du moment ou l&#039;on sait qu&#039;une exp\u00e9 (par exemple) \u00e9tait sur telle qrg, tel mode \u00e0 telle heure. On peut alors chercher dans le log un indicatif approchant du sien et tenter sa chance aupr\u00e8s du qsl manager pour obtenir la trop d\u00e9sir\u00e9e QSL, en arguant du fait que l&#039;op\u00e9rateur d&#039;en face s&#039;\u00e9tait tromp\u00e9. C&#039;est un exemple simpliste mais on peut en trouver d&#039;autres.<\/p>\n<p>Perso, je vois pas bien l&#039;int\u00e9r\u00eat de la chose mais bon. Il est clair que quelques passionn\u00e9s se damneraient pour avoir un qso manquant au tableau de chasse. Oui. <br \/>Mais au prix de quel compromis? <br \/>A part eux-m\u00eame, qui leurrent-ils?<br \/>C&#039;est un autre d\u00e9bat et aussi vieux que les challenges je pr\u00e9sume.<\/p>\n<p>Ce  qui est int\u00e9ressant, c&#039;est que devant la difficult\u00e9 de contr\u00f4ler ceci de nos jours, ce point de r\u00e8glement a donc \u00e9t\u00e9 purement et simplement abandonn\u00e9 par l&#039;ARRL. <br \/>Honn\u00eate d\u00e9cision.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Dans la m\u00eame veine que mon billet d&#039;hier concernant les modifications apport\u00e9es au r\u00e8glement du CQ WW DX, le 18 aout est paru sur le site de l&#039;ARRL un billet, indiquant la supression de la r\u00e8gle 5 de la section &hellip; <a href=\"http:\/\/f5len.org\/blog\/dxcc-point-de-reglement-retire\/\">Continuer la lecture <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[5],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-64","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-trafic"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/f5len.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/64","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/f5len.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/f5len.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/f5len.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/f5len.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=64"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/f5len.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/64\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/f5len.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=64"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/f5len.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=64"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/f5len.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=64"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}